I. The Haiku in the Machine
Last Tuesday, an AI tried to turn my weather app into a poet.
I’d been using Cursor—a code-writing jetpack—to build an iOS tool that predicts rain. But somewhere between the API integrations and my third coffee, the bot hallucinated. Instead of calculating barometric pressure, it spat out a function titled `generateExistentialHaiku()`. The result?
Gray clouds weep softly,
Data streams whisper: “You are known.”
The soul remains storm.
I sputtered my coffee. Laughed until my ribs ached. Then saved the error like a sacred text.
This is the paradox of our age: The closer we fly to technological utopia, the more vividly our humanity bleeds through the cracks. We build machines to mirror our genius, only to find they reflect our fragility instead.
II. The Soma We Swallow
Aldous Huxley’s *Brave New World* haunts me. Not because it’s dystopian, but because it’s *seductive*.
Huxley’s citizens don’t rage against oppression—they gorge on it. They swallow soma to mute longing, swap art for feelies, and trade love for frictionless promiscuity. The horror isn’t in their chains, but in their delight: They’ve forgotten what it means to want.
We’ve engineered our own soma. Not pills, but tools that promise to flatten life’s jagged edges:
Productivity cults: Apps that shame us for “wasting” time on cloud-watching or grief.
Algorithmic intimacy: Spotify’s eerily perfect playlists, which erase the thrill of a song that finds you in a dusty record store.
The tyranny of metrics: Schools that train children to optimize, not wonder; workplaces that prize output over epiphanies.
I’ll confess: I love my soma. I let ChatGPT draft emails. I code with AI. But when I catch myself Googling “meaning of life” instead of living it, I hear Huxley’s ghost hiss: “Careful. This is how they drown you in shallow water.”
III. The Horizon That Flees
Tech evangelists preach a gospel of finality: “Solve X, and humanity will ascend!”
But we are not puzzles to be solved. We are fires to be tended.
Take my journey with Cursor:
2010: Coding required years of arcane study.
2024: AI lets novices like me build apps in days.
Tomorrow: Tools will likely code themselves.
Yet the more we automate, the hungrier we grow—not for efficiency, but for resonance. The app I built works. But the one I treasure is the buggy, handwritten mess from 2018. It took weeks. It crashed constantly. But in its glitches, I found a truth no bot can generate: Struggle is the anvil where meaning is forged.
We’ve mistaken progress for perfection. But what if our tools’ true purpose isn’t to eliminate friction, but to illuminate why we endure it?
IV. The Ghost in the Glitch
Huxley’s dystopia had no room for ghosts—no room for the unquantifiable, the irrational, the sacred.
We must make space.
Protect the acts that machines can mimic but never inhabit:
The Aha Moment: In 1865, chemist August Kekulé dreamed of a snake eating its tail—and awoke with the structure of benzene. No dataset can replicate that alchemy of sleep and insight.
Irrational Love: The parent who sings lullabies to a child who’ll never speak; the friend who sits in silence with your grief. These are not “inefficiencies.” They’re the marrow of existence.
Sacred Inefficiency: Last night, I let ChatGPT plan my week. Then I tossed the schedule and lay in the grass with my son, naming clouds. “That one’s a dragon,” she said. “No—a broken robot.” We laughed. The AI, for all its genius, couldn’t fathom why.
V. A Liturgy for the Restless
I propose a new metric for progress: How much room does this tool leave for the unautomated soul?
Hack your soma: Use ChatGPT to draft emails, then rewrite them with your grandmother’s wit. Code with Cursor by day; scribble terrible poetry by candlelight.
Seek holy friction: Let robots optimize your commute—then ditch the map and wander. Forage for wild blackberries. Get lost.
Build cathedrals, not factories: Imagine social media that prioritizes depth over dopamine, AI that asks “What aches in you?” instead of “What do you want to buy?”
This isn’t Luddism. It’s rebellion by joyful engagement—a refusal to let our tools forget they’re guests, not gods.
VI. The Fire We Feed
Huxley’s nightmare was a world without fire: no risk, no yearning, no art that scorches the soul.
But fire is why we’re here.
I’ll keep coding with AI. I’ll marvel as it outpaces me. But I’ll also keep kindling sparks no algorithm can sanction:
The silence between notes in a jazz solo.
The way a poem cracks open a truth you’ve felt but never named.
The act of loving someone—not because they’re flawless, but with their flaws.
Technology, at its best, is a hearth. Let it warm us. Let it light our way. But never let it tame the wild, holy flame that makes us human.
Epilogue: Questions for the Algorithmic Age
What “irrational” act (cloud-watching, prayer, daydreaming) do you shield from optimization—and why does it matter that it stays unautomated?
If someone from 2124 read Brave New World, what modern “soma” would they say numbed us? What would you defend?
When has a tool’s failure taught you something its success never could?
Share this post